Credevo fosse un satiro, invece era un calesse. Tony Troja mi has banned . For those who do not know who he is, is that guy from her room is satirical songs, some really fun, on the Italian political situation. I was banned because I dared to say that it always makes me laugh and that should learn to take a little 'less seriously . I told him because I noticed that everyone make some criticism of his work, our miniature Grillo replied that mala manera looking for the mother who just passed us. All hell broke loose: I would never have allowed him to note that there is exactly one Luttazzi or John Stewart. I have no right to criticize him, in his words, you know why? Because "they are the PD" . And those of PD, defined PiDioti are all, without exception, with the inciucioni B., accomplices of the disaster italics. Everyone from every last one of Bersani members. To which I asked him if he was sure quite sure what he was saying, and if he had ever heard of Angelo Vassallo (and I'm also sorry later, because the board does not even deserve that name, not even written for example). From there began the sclera to sfanculare left and right, for straws, even as the worst in autoincensarsi Minzolini. But the thing that irritated him most, and that probably led him to ban, was the link to the document inbuonemani.org , a report of 100 best practices of territorial governance made by local administrators of the Democratic Party . After this link some of his followers began to be more "dialogue partners" (after telling me they also said that every in-aid to the god tony) and some began to agree with me on the need for active participation and about the use of traditional channels (ie parties). This must have experienced as an affront - a Democratic Party propaganda that is on their wall and even collect a few small fruit, sowing doubts in the minds otherwise fossilized vaffa stop. Yes, because this is the most disturbing element of this whole story, not the fact that I can no longer see / comment i video del comico da mansarda: il fatto cioè, che c'è una larghissima fetta di elettorato che oramai è totalmente assuefatto all'antipolitica più becera, più d'accatto, più sterile e improduttiva e dunque più utile al potere costituito - a destra come a sinistra - che si possa pensare . Vent'anni anni di berlusconismo (tv comprese) cinico e straniante, di opposizione afflitta da una labirintite cronica che l'ha portata a perdere appeal con l'elettorato (eufemismo), lo smantellamento continuo e progressivo di qualunque barlume di civismo in questo Paese, una stampa che è solo uno strillo continuo sugli affari privati di B e sui litigi interni al centrosinistra - molto spesso amplificati entrambi, è inevitabile che il risultato sia quello di creare un'opinione pubblica pigra e piena di preconcetti e pregiudizi, totalmente disabituata alla critica informata . Un centrosinistra, un Partito Democratico che volesse davvero ritrovare il consenso perduto, deve porsi anche questo problema: come riuscire a recuperare questa fetta , che non è piccola, di cittadini elettori di sani e giusti principi, brava gente, lavoratori onesti, ma disillusi alle estreme conseguenze e lobotomizzati dai professionisti dell'antiberlusconismo. Magari con una leadership nuova e fresca , magari con 5 o 6 temi chiari e netti con i famosi SI e NO riconoscibili a chilometri di distanza. Magari.
0 comments:
Post a Comment